2-3 " The word was made flesh"
“Was with God”
The idea of a “word”
being “with” God or even another person has an Old Testament
background. Job comments: “Yet these things you have concealed in your
heart, I know that this is with you" (10:13; NIV “in your
mind”). Similarly Job 23:13, 14: " What his soul desires, that he does,
for he performs what is appointed for me, and many such decrees are with him"
. God’s essential plans are therefore ‘with Him’, in this figure of
speech. When those plans are revealed in words, i.e. they are openly
verbalized, it would be true to say: " I will instruct you in the power
of God; what is with the Almighty I will not conceal" (Job
27:11). Wisdom, personified as a woman, was “with God” before creation-
it was not ‘with’ the sea, but it was ‘with’ God (Job 28:14; 8:22,30).
To hold a plan in one's own mind is to have it ‘with’ them. The Hebrew
text of Gen. 40:14 bears this out, when Joseph is begged: “Remember me
with yourself”. So for the essential purpose of God in His Son to be
‘with’ Him does not in any sense imply that a person was literally
‘with’ God in Heaven. Note the parallel between the word of God and the
work of God in Ps. 106:13: “They soon forgot his works; they waited not
for his counsel”. Whatever God says / plans comes to concrete
fulfillment; and the idea of a Son was always in His mind. That word
became flesh, became real and actual, in the person of Jesus.
“The word was made flesh”
So there shouldn’t be any problem with accepting that an abstract thing like the logos,
the word, could become a person. For wisdom is personified in the Old
Testament (e.g. Proverbs 7). And it is spoken of in James 3:17 as being
easy to intreat, merciful, not hypocritical- all attributes of a
person. “The word” is often put for ‘the preaching of the word’ (Acts
6:2,4,7; Tit. 2:5; Rev. 1:9; 6:9; 20:4). The man Christ Jesus was the
word of the Gospel made flesh. He was and is the epitome of what He and
others preached. This is why another title for Jesus was “the Kingdom”-
He thus described Himself when He said that He, the Kingdom, was
amongst them in first century Israel (Lk. 17:21). “The word of the
Kingdom” is paralleled with “the word” (Mt. 13:19 cp. 20-23). The
things of the Kingdom and the things of Jesus are inextricably linked.
Likewise John calls Jesus “the eternal life” (1 Jn. 1:2). The life that
He lived was the quality of life which we will eternally live in the
Kingdom. The personality of Jesus was the living quintessence of all
that He preached- as it should be with the living witness which our
lives make. To preach “Christ” was and is therefore to preach “the
things concerning the Kingdom of God”, because that Kingdom will be all
about the manifestation of the man Christ Jesus (Acts 8:5 cp. 12). So,
Jesus was “the word” in the sense that He epitomised the Gospel. This
is why James 1:18 says that we are born again by the word of the
Gospel, and 1 Pet. 1:23 says that the word who begets is the Lord
Jesus. And it is why Lk. 8:1 describes the Lord as both preaching and
“proclaiming” the Gospel of the Kingdom. Who He was and who He is [and
ever shall be] is the shewing forth of the Gospel. We likewise must not
only preach the doctrine of the Kingdom but proclaim it in our lives.
For this is the essential witness to the good news of the Kingdom.
Indeed, in all the teaching of the Lord, He was Himself the great
exemplar of it. The Sermon on the Mount was the Lord unpacking His
compelling vision for human life as He believed God intended, and as He
Himself exemplified it. It was almost a self-explanation rather than a
set of demands upon us. Yet the very fact that it was an explanation of
Himself somehow makes it all the more compelling.
The
word being made flesh was an act of the will on the Lord’s part. “The
word was made flesh” isn’t just a piece of theological description of
something that was effortlessly achieved. The principles of “the word”,
the radical implications of the word of the Gospel spoken throughout
the Old Testament Scriptures, had to be “made flesh” in the Lord,
culminating in the crucifixion. There He was “The word was made flesh”.
This was and is the ultimate outworking of the implications of the
Gospel taught in Eden, promised to Abraham, developed throughout the
prophets. And it didn’t happen automatically. That word was in the
beginning with God, but not all ‘words’ / intentions that He ‘has’
become flesh, i.e. concrete reality here on earth. God has had various
intentions which He ‘thought’ to do, but because of human weakness they
don’t actually become reality. He told Israel about His plan /
intention / logos of driving out the Canaanites: “If ye will
not drive out the inhabitants of the land… I shall do unto you, as I
thought to do unto them” (Num. 33:55,56). He ‘thought’ to do things to
them through the agency of His people; but those ‘thoughts’ never
became flesh.
The extent to which Jesus made the word
flesh needs some reflection. When He declared Himself as Messiah, the
people who had grown up with Him were scandalized (Mk. 6:3 Gk.). He was
so human that even though He never sinned, the people who
intimately knew Him for 30 years thought that He was truly one of them.
In our making the word flesh, we tend to irritate people by our
apparent righteousness, or turn them away from us by our hypocrisy. But
the Lord truly made the word flesh, to the extent that the very dregs
of society could relate to Him as one of them. There is a wonder in
this that requires sustained meditation. John’s Gospel especially seems
to speak of the “words” and “works” of the Lord Jesus almost
interchangeably (Jn. 14:10-14); in illustration of the way in which the
word of Jesus, which was the word of God, was constantly and
consistently made flesh in Him, issuing in the works / actions of this
man who was “the word made flesh”. Consider how in Jn. 8:28; 12:49,50
He says that He says only what the Father taught Him to say; whereas in Jn. 8:28 He says He does
nothing of Himself but only what the Father taught Him. His words and
His doings are thereby paralleled. The parallel between the Lord’s
words and works is again brought out in Lk. 9:43,44: “They wondered at
all things which Jesus did…He said…let these sayings
sink down into your ears”. There are no distinct ‘sayings’ of Jesus in
this context; He wanted them to see that His works were His words.
There was perfect congruence between what He said and what He did.
Perhaps this was why He told the parents of the girl whom He
resurrected “to tell no man what was done” (Lk. 8:56), even though it
was so obvious; He wanted His self-evident works to speak for
themselves, without the need for human words. For His works were
essentially His message.
“The word was made flesh” in
daily reality for Jesus. The extraordinary connection between the man
Jesus and the word of God which He preached and spoke is perhaps
reflected in Lk. 4:20: “He closed the book [of the words of God], and
he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all
them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him”. Here we have as
it were an exquisite close up of Jesus, His very body movements, His
handling of the scroll, and the movement of the congregation's eyes.
Notice that at this stage He had only read from the scroll, and not yet
begun His exposition of what He had read. The impression I take from
this is that there was an uncanny connection between Him and the word
of His Father. The Son reading His Father’s word, with a personality
totally in conformity to it, must have been quite something to behold.
He was the word of God made flesh in a person, in a way no other person
had or could ever be. Thus He was indeed “The word was made flesh”. The
idea of words becoming flesh is a reflection of the Hebrew idea that a
person's words become their actions. Thus we read of Solomon's "acts"
or, RVmg., "sayings" (2 Chron. 9:5). There is no requirement for a
person to exist in one form and then turn into another form. There was
perfect congruence between the personality of Jesus, and the words of
God which He preached. Thus the people marvelled at Him, commenting
"What is this word?" (Lk. 4:36 RV). God's word was made flesh, was made
personal, in Him. In this sense there was almost no need for Jesus to
say specific words about Himself- His character and personality showed
forth that word, that logos, that essential message. The Jews
pressured Him: "If you are the Christ, tell us plainly". But He could
respond: "I told you, and you believe not: the works that I do... these
bear witness of me" (Jn. 10:24,25). Of course, they'd have complained
that He had not told them in so many words. His comment was
that His "works", His life, His being, showed plainly who He was, His
personality was "the [plain] word" which they were demanding. He was
the word made flesh in totality and to perfection.
It
bears repeating that “the word was made flesh” in Jesus in the sense
that there was absolute congruence between His teaching and His
actions. Thus He not only taught that distinctions between
clean and unclean were ended; He actually went and ate / fellowshipped
with sinners and touched lepers. The Old Testament prophets so absorbed
the word of God that their emotions were His; they mourned and grew
angry in the same way as He did. Their words were therefore both theirs
and His at the same time; that's why it's hard at times in the prophets
to decide whether we are reading the feelings / thoughts of the
prophet, or of God. In the symbolic acts of the prophets (e.g. Isaiah
20, Jeremiah 19, Ezekiel 4 and 5) we see their actual lives and deeds
being in a sense the Word of God embodied in them. Von Rad suggests
that "the entry of the word into a prophet's bodily life...
approximates to what the writer of the fourth Gospel says about the
word becoming flesh" (1). The Lord Jesus was the greatest of the
prophets and the ultimate example of God's word becoming identified
with and in the very core personality of a human being. However, as a
concept, the word could become flesh in men who were not the begotten
Son of God- e.g. the prophets- and it's possible that Jewish minds in
the first century would have actually understood John's language of
"the word made flesh" in this kind of prophetic context.
As the resurrected Lord stood before the disciples, he says: “These are
my words which I spake unto you” (Lk. 24:44 RV), and goes on to say
that His resurrection had been predicted throughout the Old Testament
words of God. He had made both His words and the words of God into
flesh as He stood there. He didn’t say ‘Look everyone, I’ve risen!’. He
just stood there, reminded them of the words of the prophets, and His
own words, and said “These are my words”. He was so powerfully and
completely the word made flesh.
John opens his first
letter by speaking about "the word" as if he refers to something neuter
and abstract- and yet he speaks of how he personally touched and
handled it. The grammar of 1 Jn. 1:1-3 refers to an abstract idea, the logos-
but the reference is evidently to the real historical person of Jesus.
It seems to me that this was John's inspired way of getting over the
awesome extent to which "the word became flesh", all the ideas inherent
in God and in His word were expressed seamlessly in Jesus; there was
such perfect congruence between the word Jesus spoke and the person He
was. No longer should these passages be seen as merely the battleground
for the arian-athanasian, unitarian-trinitarian argument. The wonder of
what is being actually said by John needs to be taken on board by us,
and risen up to; for the word is to become flesh in us as it was in our
Lord.
The Name / Word Becoming Flesh
There's
a Hebrew grammatical feature known as the intensive plural, whereby one
great, important, significant thing is spoken of in the plural. The AV
margin in Is. 53:9 speaks of the deaths [plural] of Messiah- i.e. the one great significant death of Messiah. So with elohim.
It can effectively mean the ONE great mighty one. The common Old
Testament Name of God, Yahweh Elohim, then becomes - Yahweh will be
through the one great ONE- i.e., a prophecy of the Lord Jesus who would
manifest Him supremely. Bearing this in mind, we come to John’s
statement that the Word was with God, was God, and became flesh in the
Lord Jesus, and we behold the glory of that. John’s Gospel is evidently
full of allusions to Jewish terminology and ideas. He also alludes to
many surrounding pagan ideas, recasting them with reference to the Lord
Jesus, demonstrating thereby their error. Philo’s influence was
significant in the first century. He had developed the idea that “the
logos” was what he called the "archangel of many names," and the "name
of God". The Logos is also designated by him as the "high priest”.
John’s writings, and Hebrews, are at pains to show where these ideas
were wrong, and in what sense they could have some truth in relation to
the Lord Jesus. He, and not Philo’s abstract ‘logos’, is the
one ultimate high priest; He is greater than Angels; and He is the one
who ultimately came in the Father’s Name and revealed it to us (Jn.
5:43 etc.). The Son has now been given the Name of the Father (Phil.
2:6-11; Is. 9:6; Rev. 3:12); but the Son’s Name is now “the logos of
God” (Rev. 19:13). The logos that became flesh thus refers to the Name
of the Father, Yahweh, which became the One special one in the person
of Christ.
The ideas of the Name, the word and the glory
of God are heavily interconnected. I’ve explored this at length at http://www.carelinks.net/books/dh/james/james_d05.html
. Jn. 1:14 says that when the word of God was made flesh in the Son of
God, we saw the glory of God. If “The word” which was made flesh is in
fact a reference to the Name of God, then this becomes understandable.
And so the logos of God, the Name of God, being with Him in the
beginning and being Him in a sense, was revealed fully in the human
person (“flesh”) of the Lord Jesus. The Lord said this in so many
words: “I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me”
(Jn. 17:6). John surely has this in mind when he comments that the word
/ Name became flesh, and we saw that glory, but others in “the world”
didn’t perceive it (Jn. 1:14). John parallels the word becoming flesh,
with the Son declaring the Father who cannot be seen (Jn. 1:18). This
is in fact a reference to the declaration of Yahweh’s Name to Moses, at
which time Moses was reminded that God cannot be physically seen. Thus
the declaration of the Yahweh Name to Moses is paralleled with the word
/ Name being made flesh. The Father glorified His Name in the Son (Jn.
12:28), who was the word of God. Remember the links between the Name,
the glory and the word of God. Summing up, the reference to the logos /
word becoming flesh in the Lord Jesus therefore speaks of the
fulfillment of God’s Name in Christ, just as any father’s name is in a
sense fulfilled in his son. And countless times in the Old Testament,
this had been foretold- Yahweh would be elohim, one great one- the Lord
Jesus, His Son.
"Dwelt among us"
"Dwelt
among us" (Jn. 1:14) can too easily be misread as meaning that the Word
was once in Heaven but came to earth to live amongst us humans. But
this (yet again) is to miss the Old Testament background. Time and
again, the LXX uses the Greek word kenosa ("dwelt") to refer to how God dwelt in the sanctuary. The "us" amongst whom God now dwells through His logos
is not humanity generally, the inhabitants of planet earth, but
specifically we who believe and form His sanctuary / dwelling place
amidst the unbelieving world. Perhaps this is John's equivalent to
Matthew's reference to how where two or three are gathered together in
His Name, there the Lord will dwell in their midst (Mt. 18:20).
Notes
(1) Gerhard Von Rad, Old Testament Theology (Louisville: Westminster John Kox Press, 2001) Vol. 2 p. 274.
