An introduction to God’s Heavenly Law (Part 1)
Introduction:
As readers of the Bible we are
introduced to God’s law in both the Old and New Testaments and yet the majority
of us have no legal background to appreciate the work of the Lord Jesus Christ
within the context of litigation as defined by God’s Heavenly Law (meaning that
the law found in the Bible has its origin in heaven as the heavens are God’s
[Psalms 115:16]).
Although there
is no need for us to become experts in law, there may be a need to gain some
basic understanding of the mechanics of law with the sole purpose of
appreciating how the Lord Jesus Christ has become the prime ‘advocate’ in
interpreting the Heavenly Law, not to our condemnation, but to offer us life and
peace.
So, if we had
to ask a ‘law student’ about the term ‘law’, we would certainly be told that
there are different types of law, such as contractual law, tax law,
administrative law, maritime law, etc. We may also be informed that the ‘law’
consists of common law, statutes and case law. God’s Heavenly Law is no
different, in fact we will discover that man’s laws are based on God’s laws as
God’s laws came first.
The Heavenly
Law has its beginnings as a common law in the book of Genesis. But what is
‘common law’? Well it is a primitive form of law, i.e. society formulates an
informal communal law, and if we turn to the Bible we find, for example, that
the instructions we suppose Adam gave to Eve while they were in the Garden of
Eden may be classified as a form of common law.
If we wish to
define common law further, we will find traces of it pre-flood as Adam, Eve,
Cain and Abel, clearly had communal rules (based on instructions received from
God) pertaining to behaviour, marriage, violence, murder, etc. Interestingly,
even today no law states, “thou shalt not kill”. Its origin is found with
common law, and as students of the Bible we believe it had its beginnings in the
book of Genesis with Cain and Abel. We know that Cain was a murderer (Gen 4:8)
based on God’s judgement at the time. Today, this judgement forms part of every
society’s common law and, maybe unknowingly, communities are in a way upholding
one of the most basic laws of God, a common law dated back to Genesis 4.
Post-flood we
find that common law develops further and we read of how Abraham’s concept of
sacrifices is expanded as he is commanded to offer his son, Isaac. We also
discover that God’s law makes provision for a specific priesthood as we read
about Melchizedek and later Joseph – and all of this happened prior to God
formulating a contractual agreement with the nation of Israel in the form of the
tables of stone.
However, what
should we try and glean when studying law? To my mind, within the context of the
Word of God, we need to gain a basic understanding of how the ‘law’ operates,
and in Genesis 26 we are given a glimpse of the mechanics of God’s Heavenly Law.
Here we are
introduced to various aspects of God’s law. Notice how we are suddenly given
detail about the law as if we are supposed to know that the law consists of
various pillars: “Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge,
my commandments, my statutes, and my laws”(Gen 26:5). Now although it may be
difficult to fully understand what this verse is actually implying, may I
suggest that this section of scripture is in fact introducing us to the various
forms of law.
What I am
suggesting is that, like man’s law, God’s Heavenly Law consists of various
pillars that modern scholars of the law also assign to the law. In other words,
I am suggesting that we are told that Abraham was obedient to various forms of
law, and these forms of law can be described as:
-
Common law, and
-
Old
authority, and
-
A
specific law such as contractual law, and
-
Case
law (where a judge has interpreted and applied a specific law to a case between
a plaintiff [claimant] and a defendant).
If our
understanding of the verse is correct, well then we are told that Abraham is
indeed a man of God. What we are suggesting here sets Abraham’s obedience on a
higher plane, and similarly we should ask ourselves the question: How do I
match up against God’s various forms of Heavenly Law? This question needs
to be asked because James reminds us that “whosoever shall keep the whole
law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all” (ch 2:10). Maybe we
are now in a better position to consider the full meaning and impact of James’
words and challenge to us.
THE MECHANICS OF THE HEAVENLY LAW
Jurisdiction as part of the mechanics of the Heavenly Law:
Another aspect
associated with the law is the very important aspect of jurisdiction. It
is always critical to establish whether a court of law has the power of
jurisdiction, i.e. has it authority to hear and judge a particular case?
In the Old
Testament God provided cities of refuge, and the jurisdiction (influence of
power) of the Law of Moses was not valid in these cities. Obviously this points
forward to the Lord Jesus Christ, who nullifies the jurisdiction of the Law of
Moses on our lives, thereby saving us all from the sure curse of death. We read
the following in Romans 8:2, “For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ
Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.”
Again, once we
improve our knowledge of a specific field associated with spiritual matters we
become so much more appreciative of what the Lord Jesus Christ did and still
does for us. It certainly is a scary thing to know that a judge will show no
mercy and proclaim the death sentence upon you and me. To then hear that there
is a place of refuge, which falls outside the jurisdiction of this unsympathetic
judge, makes us realise what a friend indeed we have in Jesus!
Case Law as
part of the mechanics of the Heavenly Law:
In applying
law and trying to give advice how a law will impact on a person, it is needful
to study case law, as it not only refers back to the various laws,
authorities, etc., but it also allows us to predict how the judiciary stands on
certain legal issues.
As these
principles are based on and come from, the God of Israel, it therefore stands to
reason that we too can learn a great deal of God and His high standards if we
consider the case law where Jesus is acting as judge and therefore
referring to, and interpreting, God’s Heavenly Law.
To
purposefully express a point, we will consider two cases, not because the
subject matter is a fundamental teaching of Bible study - which it may be – but
because these two issues serve to illustrate what we are trying to establish,
i.e. that case law plays a prominent role in matters associated with God’s
Heavenly Law.
The following
table, which deals with the first example, i.e. sabbath-keeping in the Old
Testament, endeavours to highlight how case law encapsulates the other aspects
of a particular law:
Common
Law: |
Statutes: |
Opinion: |
Judgement: |
Sabbath keeping instituted in the beginning:
And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he
had rested from all his work which God created and made. (Gen 2:3) | Sabbath
keeping as part of the Law of Moses:
Remember
the sabbath day, to keep it holy… (Exo 20:8-11) |
No
legal opinion available on ‘sabbath-keeping’ at the time:
And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to
him. (Nu 15:34)
| Case
law formulated on breaking the Sabbath both within the framework of common
law and the Law of Moses (Torah):
And the LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the
congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp. (Nu 15:35) |
Based on this
table, it is clear that in the legal world, case law forms a very
critical part of judging, as it indicates how the court and a judge interprets
and applies law in practice. What is absolutely fascinating is how the Old
Testament’s case law always results in death, whereas the New Testament’s case
law always brings about hope. Let’s now do a similar exercise, considering
adultery, and see how the Lord Jesus Christ, as a judge, ushers in a new case
law and therefore improving on old case law:
Common
Law: |
Statutes: |
Opinion: |
Judgement: |
Adultery instituted in the beginning:
And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah,
saying, Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold,
she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her
be burnt. (Gen 38:24) | Adultery as part of the Law of Moses:
And the
man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that
committeth adultery with his neighbor's wife, the adulterer and the
adulteress shall surely be put to death. (Lev 20:10-16) |
Pharisees asking for Jesus opinion on the subject of adultery:
Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what
sayest thou? This they said, tempting him that they might have to accuse
him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as
though he heard them not. (John 8:5-6)
| New
case law formulated on committing adultery within the framework of the Law
of Christ:
So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them,
He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her… She
said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go,
and sin no more. (John 8:7, 11) |
Now that we have a very basic
understanding of the mechanics of law we can begin to appreciate better the
conflict which took place between the Lord Jesus and the champions of the Law of
Moses, the Pharisees.
And is it not wonderful to witness
our Judge in action, to taste his mercy, and to see how he introduces new case
law without an objection being raised by the Pharisees! The woman we read of in
John 8 had no hope of life, but with Jesus at her side she suddenly fell within
a jurisdiction where the Law of Moses had no say. However, the Lord Jesus
Christ, in formulating his judgement, refers to the Heavenly Law (of which the
Law of Moses is a part), and so dynamic is the Son of God that he interprets and
applies the Law of Moses to offer life instead of death.
We leave Jesus here, having learned
so much, but also realising that the Lord Jesus has left us with a greater
responsibility than before. If the Law of Moses required much detail in
application, well then the Law of Christ requires much application in the
smallest detail. None of us is without sin too, so we pray that God may instil
in us a lasting memory to remember this case law as we deal with one another.
God willing, we will continue next
time to consider the various options that the law may offer us, the choice of
being judged or not, and then draw Part one to a conclusion.
(To be continued).
Bro Ronnie van Rooyen (South Africa)